SERVICE ADDS PREPAID TUITION PLANS TO NO-RULE LIST.
Rev. Proc. 96-34; 1996-1 C.B. 721
- Institutional AuthorsInternal Revenue Service
- Cross-Reference
For prior coverage, see Tax Notes, Sept. 4, 1995, p. 1151; or see 95
TNT 171-3. Also see Tax Notes, Dec. 12, 1994, p. 1317.
State of Michigan, et al. v. United States, 802 F.Supp. 120, 92 TNT
173-17 (W.D. Mich. 1992), rev'd 40 F.3d 817, 94 TNT 221-4 (6th Cir.
1994)
Communications Division
PART III
Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous
26 CFR 601.201: Rulings and determination letters
(Also Part I, sections 61, 115, 163, 1275, 2501, 7701; 1.61-7, 1.163-
7, 1.1275-4, 25.2501-1, 301.7701-2)
- Code Sections
- Subject Areas/Tax Topics
- Index Termsstate and municipal income
- Jurisdictions
- LanguageEnglish
- Tax Analysts Document NumberDoc 96-17217 (2 original pages)
- Tax Analysts Electronic Citation96 TNT 115-14
Superseded by Rev. Proc. 97-3
Rev. Proc. 96-34
SECTION 1. PURPOSE
This revenue procedure amplifies Rev. Proc. 96-3, 1996-1 I.R.B. 82, which sets forth areas of the Internal Revenue Code under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Domestic) in which the Internal Revenue Service will not issue advance rulings or determination letters.
SECTION 2. BACKGROUND
Rev. Proc 96-3, section 5, lists specific areas in which rulings or determination letters will not be issued because the areas are under extensive study. This revenue procedure adds a subparagraph for state-created prepaid tuition plans.
SECTION 3. PROCEDURE
Rev. Proc. 96-3 is amplified by adding to section 5 the following: Section 115.--Income of states, municipalities, etc. -- The results of transactions pursuant to a plan or arrangement created by state statute a primary objective of which is to enable participants to pay for the costs of a post-secondary education for themselves or a designated beneficiary, including: (i) whether the plan or arrangement, itself, is an entity separate from a state and, if so, how the plan or arrangement is treated for federal tax purposes; and (ii) whether any contract under the plan or arrangement is a debt instrument and, if so, how interest or original issue discount attributable to the contract is treated for federal tax purposes. (Also sections 61, 163, 1275, 2501 and 7701)
SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE
This revenue procedure applies to all ruling requests, including any pending in the National Office on June 11, 1996.
SECTION 5. EFFECT ON OTHER REVENUE PROCEDURES
Rev. Proc. 96-3 is amplified.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal author of this revenue procedure is Craig Wojay of the Office of Assistant Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and Products). For further information regarding this revenue procedure, contact Mr. Wojay at (202) 622-3920 (not a toll-free number).
- Institutional AuthorsInternal Revenue Service
- Cross-Reference
For prior coverage, see Tax Notes, Sept. 4, 1995, p. 1151; or see 95
TNT 171-3. Also see Tax Notes, Dec. 12, 1994, p. 1317.
State of Michigan, et al. v. United States, 802 F.Supp. 120, 92 TNT
173-17 (W.D. Mich. 1992), rev'd 40 F.3d 817, 94 TNT 221-4 (6th Cir.
1994)
Communications Division
PART III
Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous
26 CFR 601.201: Rulings and determination letters
(Also Part I, sections 61, 115, 163, 1275, 2501, 7701; 1.61-7, 1.163-
7, 1.1275-4, 25.2501-1, 301.7701-2)
- Code Sections
- Subject Areas/Tax Topics
- Index Termsstate and municipal income
- Jurisdictions
- LanguageEnglish
- Tax Analysts Document NumberDoc 96-17217 (2 original pages)
- Tax Analysts Electronic Citation96 TNT 115-14