IRS Clarifies Procedures For Furnishing Technical Advice.
Rev. Proc. 2001-41; 2001-2 C.B. 173
- Institutional AuthorsInternal Revenue Service
- Cross-ReferenceFor a summary of Rev. Proc. 2000-2, 2000-1 IRB 73, see Tax Notes,
- Subject Areas/Tax Topics
- Index Termsemployee benefit plansexempt organizationsenforcement
- Jurisdictions
- LanguageEnglish
- Tax Analysts Document NumberDoc 2001-19955 (3 original pages)
- Tax Analysts Electronic Citation2001 TNT 142-19
Modified by Rev. Proc. 2002-2
Rev. Proc. 2001-41
SECTION 1. PURPOSE
.01 This revenue procedure modifies Rev. Proc. 2001-2 to clarify that Technical Advice will not be issued on frivolous issues and to provide a procedure for expedited review of denials of Technical Advice where the taxpayer requests Technical Advice on frivolous issues.
SECTION 2. MODIFICATIONS
.01 Section 3 of Rev. Proc. 2001-2, On What Issues May Technical Advice be Requested Under This Procedure, is modified by the addition of subsection .03 below, which provides that technical advice will not be issued on frivolous issues.
Technical advice will not be issued on frivolous issues. For
purposes of this program, a "frivolous issue" is one without
basis in fact or law, or that espouses a position which has been
held by the courts to be frivolous or groundless. Examples of
frivolous or groundless issues include, but are not limited to:
1. frivolous "constitutional" claims, such as claims that the
requirement to file tax returns and pay taxes constitutes an
unreasonable search barred by the Fourth Amendment; violates
Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment protections of due process;
violates Thirteenth Amendment protections against involuntary
servitude; or is unenforceable because the Sixteenth Amendment
does not authorize nonapportioned direct taxes or was never
ratified;
2. claims that income taxes are voluntary, that the term
"income" is not defined in the Internal Revenue Code, or that
preparation and filing of income tax returns violates the
Paperwork Reduction Act;
3. claims that tax may be imposed only on coins minted under a
gold or silver standard or that receipt of Federal Reserve Notes
does not cause an accretion to wealth;
4. claims that a person is not taxable on income because he or
she falls within a class entitled to "reparation claims" or an
extra-statutory class of individuals exempt from tax, e.g.,
"free-born" individuals;
5. claims that a taxpayer can refuse to pay taxes on the basis
of opposition to certain governmental expenditures;
6. claims that taxes apply only to federal employees; only to
residents of Puerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, the
District of Columbia, or "federal enclaves"; or that the
Internal Revenue Code imposes taxes on U.S. citizens and
residents only on income derived from foreign based activities;
7. claims that wages or personal service income are not
"income," are "nontaxable receipts," or "are a nontaxable
exchange for labor;" or
8. other claims the courts have characterized as frivolous or
groundless.
.02 Section 11 of Rev. Proc. 2001-2, How Does a Taxpayer Appeal a Director's or Area Director, Appeals', Decision not to Seek Technical Advice, is modified by adding subsection .05 below, which provides for expedited review procedures where the denial of technical advice is because the requested advice concerns frivolous issues.
Special procedures applicable to appeals regarding frivolous
issues. If the request for technical advice concerns a
"frivolous issue," as described in Section 3.03 of this Revenue
Procedure, technical advice will not be given, and the examining
officer or appeals officer will deny the taxpayer's request for
referral. The taxpayer may appeal the decision of the examining
officer or the appeals officer; however, if the territory
manager or area director, appeals, determines that no technical
advice will be sought, an expedited review procedure will be
followed.
This expedited review procedure will consist of the following:
1) the territory manager or area director, appeals, will inform
the appropriate official described in section 11.04 above (the
Industry Director, LMSB; the Director, Field Compliance, SB/SE;
the Director, Compliance, W&I; the Director, International,
LMSB; the Director, Federal, State, and Local Governments; the
Director, Tax Exempt Bonds; the Director, Indian Tribal
Governments; or the Chief, Appeals) of the request for review
and the basis for the denial, but will not forward the
taxpayer's written request and statements, unless requested to
do so by the official; 2) the field office or area office will
not suspend action on the issue; 3) within 15 days, the official
will notify the territory manager or area director, appeals,
whether the proposed denial is approved or disapproved. The
official may also determine that the expedited process is not
warranted and request all of the information supplied by the
taxpayer and allow suspension of action on the item while the
denial is reviewed; and 4) the field office or area office will
then notify the taxpayer of the result of the review of the
denial.
SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE
This revenue procedure is effective July 23, 2001, the date this revenue procedure was released to the news media.
SECTION 4. DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal author of this revenue procedure is George Bowden of the Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure & Administration). For further information regarding this revenue procedure contact Mr. Bowden on 202-622-3400 (not a toll free call).
- Institutional AuthorsInternal Revenue Service
- Cross-ReferenceFor a summary of Rev. Proc. 2000-2, 2000-1 IRB 73, see Tax Notes,
- Subject Areas/Tax Topics
- Index Termsemployee benefit plansexempt organizationsenforcement
- Jurisdictions
- LanguageEnglish
- Tax Analysts Document NumberDoc 2001-19955 (3 original pages)
- Tax Analysts Electronic Citation2001 TNT 142-19