Tax Notes logo

Temporary and Proposed Regulations Require Corporations to Disclose Tax Shelters

MAR. 2, 2000

T.D. 8877; 65 F.R. 11205-11211

DATED MAR. 2, 2000
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Institutional Authors
    Internal Revenue Service
  • Cross-Reference
    REG-103735-00.

    Notice 2000-15.

    This document appeared in TNT as 2000 TNT 40-17 Database 'Tax Notes Today 2000', View '(Number' and in the AccServ &

    Microfiche as Doc 2000-5715 (27 original pages).
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Areas/Tax Topics
  • Index Terms
    shelters
    shelters, registration
    returns
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 2000-6361 (7 original pages)
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2000 TNT 44-89
Citations: T.D. 8877; 65 F.R. 11205-11211

 

=============== SUMMARY ===============

 

The IRS has published temporary and proposed regulations (T.D. 8877; REG-103735-00) under section 6011(a) requiring corporations to attach statements to their income tax returns describing their tax shelters.

The temporary regs describe two types of corporate tax shelter transactions that corporations must report. Both types of transaction are subject to a monetary threshold called "the projected tax effect test." The corporation also must retain all documents related to a transaction required to be disclosed, including marketing materials and promoter correspondence, until the statute of limitations on the first return expires.

Under the temporary regs corporations must report any transaction that is (1) the same or substantially similar to transactions listed in IRS published guidance as reportable tax shelter transactions and (2) expected to reduce the corporation's federal income tax liability by more than $1 million in a single tax year, or more than $2 million for any combination of tax years. (For a listing of transactions that must be reported, see Notice 2000-15, Doc 2000-5712 (3 original pages).

The regs also require corporations to report any transaction that (1) is expected to reduce the corporation's federal income tax liability by more than $5 million in a single tax year, or more than $10 million for any combination of tax years, and (2) features at least two of six extrinsic characteristics relating to the terms of the deal. Those characteristics are confidentiality; contingent fees, recission rights, or indemnities; marketing; a book/tax difference exceeding $5 million; a tax-indifferent party; and cross-border tax arbitrage.

To accommodate legitimate business transactions, the temporary regs exempt several types of transactions from disclosure, such as those carried out in the ordinary course of business consistently with customary commercial practice. To qualify for the exception, the corporation would have to show either that it would have entered the transaction irrespective of tax benefits or that there is a longstanding and generally accepted understanding of the expected tax treatment that is in the public domain.

Also considered to be part of the ordinary course of business are transactions involving the acquisition, disposition, or restructuring of a business, a recapitalization of a business, or the acquisition of capital for use in a business. Corporations that don't want to report those transactions would still have to show either that they would have entered the transaction irrespective of tax benefits or that there is a longstanding and generally accepted understanding of the expected tax treatment that is in the public domain. They may, however, refuse to disclose on the ground that that there is no reasonable basis under the federal tax law for denial of the expected tax benefits.

The IRS warns that corporations that fail to file the required statement may be considered to lack reasonable cause for return positions taken because of a transaction that should have been reported but was not, as the failure might indicate that they did not act in good faith under section 6664(c)(1). It notes, however, that a failure to file would probably not result in failure to file penalties under section 6651.

T.D. 8877 is effective for corporate income tax returns filed after February 28, 2000.

This document appeared in TNT as 2000 TNT 40-17 Database 'Tax Notes Today 2000', View '(Number' and in the AccServ & Microfiche as Doc 2000-5715 (27 original pages).

 

=============== FULL TEXT ===============

 

[4830-01-u]

 

 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

 

Internal Revenue Service

 

26 CFR Parts 1 and 602

 

 

Treasury Decision 8877

 

 

RIN 1545-AX82

 

 

[1] AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

[2] ACTION: Temporary regulations.

[3] SUMMARY: This document contains temporary regulations requiring certain corporate taxpayers to file a statement with their Federal corporate income tax return under section 6011(a). The temporary regulations affect corporations participating in certain reportable transactions. The text of these temporary regulations also serves as the text of the proposed regulations set forth in the notice of proposed rulemaking on this subject in REG-103735-00 published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register.

[4] DATES: Effective date. These temporary regulations are effective for Federal corporate income tax returns filed after February 28, 2000.

[5] Applicability date. For dates of applicability, see Section 1.6011-4T(g) of these regulations.

[6] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Castanon, (202) 622-3080, or Mary Beth Collins, (202) 622-3070, (not toll-free numbers).

[7] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Paperwork Reduction Act

[8] These regulations are being issued without prior notice and public procedure pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553). For this reason, the collections of information contained in these regulations have been reviewed and, pending receipt and evaluation of public comments, approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1545-1685. Responses to these collections of information are mandatory.

[9] An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number.

[10] For further information concerning these collections of information, and where to submit comments on the collections of information and the accuracy of the estimated burden, and suggestions for reducing this burden, please refer to the preamble to the cross- referencing notice of proposed rulemaking published in the Proposed Rules section of this issue of the Federal Register.

[11] Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.

Background

[12] The Treasury Department and the IRS are concerned about the proliferation of corporate tax shelters. These temporary regulations are intended to provide the Service with early notification of large corporate transactions with characteristics that may be indicative of such tax shelter activity.

[13] Accordingly, this document amends 26 CFR part 1 regarding the general filing requirement for persons required to file a return for a taxable year with respect to a tax imposed under section 11. Section 6011(a) provides that any person made liable for any tax imposed by the Internal Revenue Code (Code), or with respect to the collection thereof, shall make a return or statement according to the forms and regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury.

Explanation of Provisions

I. Disclosure Statement Required for Certain Corporate Taxpayers

[14] The temporary regulations provide that every person that is required to file a return for a taxable year with respect to any tax imposed under section 11 (corporate taxpayers) and that has participated in a reportable transaction shall attach a disclosure statement to its return for each taxable year for which the taxpayer's Federal income tax liability is affected by its participation in the reportable transaction. In addition, a copy of the disclosure statement must be sent to the IRS in Washington, DC for the first taxable year for which the transaction is disclosed on the taxpayer's Federal income tax return. The temporary regulations outline the form and content of the disclosure statement and also provide an example of the statement.

[15] Where the temporary regulations require a taxpayer to attach a disclosure statement to its return, the information required to be set forth thereon is a required part of the return to the same extent as information required pursuant to prescribed forms. See section 1.6011-1. Therefore, when a taxpayer verifies its return, which includes a declaration that the return is complete, a taxpayer affirms that it has accurately made all disclosures required by these temporary regulations.

[16] In the event of an underpayment attributable to a reportable transaction, a taxpayer's failure to satisfy the disclosure requirements of the temporary regulations may affect its exposure to penalties under sections 6662 and 6663 of the Code. Section 6664(c)(1) provides that such penalties may not be imposed with respect to any portion of a taxpayer's underpayment "if it is shown that there was a reasonable cause for such portion and that the taxpayer acted in good faith with respect to such portion." (Emphasis added.) Whether a taxpayer is considered to have satisfied the requirements of section 6664(c)(1) is determined on a case-by-case basis, taking into account all pertinent facts and circumstances. See section 1.6664-4(b)(1).

[17] The fact that a professional tax advisor has advised a taxpayer that its return position is more likely than not the proper tax treatment is not necessarily sufficient to satisfy the requirements of section 6664(c)(1). If a taxpayer has an underpayment attributable to its participation in a reportable transaction that has not been properly disclosed on its return, the nondisclosure could indicate that the taxpayer has not acted in "good faith" with respect to the underpayment, even if the taxpayer's return position has sufficient legal justification to meet the minimum requirements of section 6664(c)(1). In such a case, the determination of whether a taxpayer has acted in "good faith" will depend on all of the facts and circumstances, including the reason or reasons why the taxpayer failed to make the required disclosure.

II. Reportable Transactions

[18] The temporary regulations define two categories of reportable transactions. The first category includes certain types of transactions identified by the Treasury and the Service as tax avoidance transactions. The second category includes transactions that warrant further scrutiny because they possess certain identified characteristics that are common in corporate tax shelters.

[19] The regulations require disclosure only for large transactions that provide tax savings in excess of certain dollar thresholds (the projected tax effect test). In addition, the regulations contain exceptions to ensure that normal business transactions are not subject to disclosure. The fact that a transaction is reportable or not reportable under these regulations shall not affect the legal determination whether the tax benefits claimed with respect to the transaction are allowable.

[20] The first category of reportable transactions includes any transaction that is the same as or substantially similar to one of the specified types of tax avoidance transactions that the IRS has identified by published guidance as a listed transaction for purposes of section 6011 and that is expected to reduce the taxpayer's Federal income tax liability by more than $1 million in any single taxable year or by a total of more than $2 million for any combination of taxable years. However, a listed transaction is not treated as a reportable transaction if it has affected the taxpayer's Federal income tax liability as reported on any tax return filed on or before February 28, 2000.

[21] The second category of reportable transactions includes transactions entered into after February 28, 2000, that are expected to reduce a taxpayer's Federal income tax liability by more than $5 million in any single taxable year or by a total of more than $10 million for any combination of taxable years and that have at least two of the following characteristics:

(A) The taxpayer has participated in the transaction under conditions of confidentiality (as defined in section 301.6111-2T(c)).

(B) The taxpayer has obtained or been provided with contractual protection against the possibility that part or all of the intended tax benefits from the transaction will not be sustained, including, but not limited to, recission rights, the right to a full or partial refund of fees paid to any person, fees that are contingent on the taxpayer's realization of tax benefits from the transaction, insurance protection with respect to the tax treatment of the transaction, or a tax indemnity or similar agreement (other than a customary indemnity provided by a principal to the transaction that did not participate in the promotion of the transaction to the taxpayer).

(C) The taxpayer's participation in the transaction was promoted, solicited, or recommended by one or more persons who have received or are expected to receive fees or other consideration with an aggregate value in excess of $100,000, and such person or persons' entitlement to such fees or other consideration was contingent on the taxpayer's participation in the transaction.

(D) The expected treatment of the transaction for Federal income tax purposes in any taxable year differs or is expected to differ by more than $5 million from the treatment of the transaction for purposes of determining book income as taken into account on the schedule M-1 (or comparable schedule) on the taxpayer's Federal corporate income tax return for the same period.

(E) The transaction involves the participation of a person that the taxpayer knows or has reason to know is in a Federal income tax position that differs from that of the taxpayer (such as a tax exempt entity or a foreign person), and the taxpayer knows or has reason to know that such difference in tax position has permitted the transaction to be structured on terms that are intended to provide the taxpayer with more favorable Federal income tax treatment than it could have obtained without the participation of such person (or another person in a similar tax position).

(F) The expected characterization of any significant aspect of the transaction for Federal income tax purposes differs from the expected characterization of such aspect of the transaction for purposes of taxation of any party to the transaction in another country.

[22] However, a transaction that has at least two of the foregoing characteristics is not a reportable transaction if any of the following conditions is satisfied --

(A) The taxpayer has participated in the transaction in the ordinary course of its business in a form consistent with customary commercial practice, and the taxpayer reasonably determines that it would have participated in the same transaction on substantially the same terms irrespective of the expected Federal income tax benefits;

(B) The taxpayer has participated in the transaction in the ordinary course of its business in a form consistent with customary commercial practice, and the taxpayer reasonably determines that there is a long-standing and generally accepted understanding that the expected Federal income tax benefits from the transaction (taking into account any combination of intended tax consequences) are allowable under the Code for substantially similar transactions;

(C) The taxpayer reasonably determines that there is no reasonable basis under Federal tax law for denial of any significant portion of the expected Federal income tax benefits from the transaction; or

(D) The transaction is identified in published guidance as being excepted from disclosure.

[23] A transaction involving the acquisition, disposition, or restructuring of a business, including the acquisition, disposition, or other change in the ownership or control of an entity that is engaged in a business, or a transaction involving a recapitalization or an acquisition of capital for use in the taxpayer's business, shall be considered a transaction carried out in the ordinary course of a taxpayer's business.

III. Record Retention

[24] The taxpayer must retain all documents related to a transaction subject to disclosure under this section until the expiration of the statute of limitations for the first taxable year for which a disclosure statement is filed with its tax return. (This obligation is in addition to any document retention requirements that section 6001 generally imposes on the taxpayer.) Such documents include, but are not limited to, the following: all marketing materials related to the transaction; all written analyses used in decision-making related to the transaction; all correspondence and agreements related to the transaction between the taxpayer and any promoter, advisor, lender, or other party to the reportable transaction; all documents discussing, referring to, or demonstrating the tax benefits arising from the reportable transaction; and all documents, if any, referring to the business purposes for the reportable transaction.

IV. Effective Date

[25] The temporary regulations apply to Federal corporate income tax returns filed after February 28, 2000.

Special Analyses

[26] It has been determined that this Treasury decision is not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It has also been determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these regulations. It is hereby certified that the collection of information in these regulations will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This certification is based upon the fact that the persons responsible for filing the statement required by these regulations are principally large publicly traded corporations, and the burden is not significant as described earlier in the preamble. Therefore, a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) is not required. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, these temporary regulations will be submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on their impact on small business.

Drafting Information

[27] The principal authors of these regulations are Mary Beth Collins and Richard Castanon, Office of Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries). However, other personnel from the IRS and Treasury Department participated in their development.

List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1

[28] Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Adoption of Amendments to the Regulations

[29] Accordingly, 26 CFR parts 1 and 602 are amended as follows:

PART 1 -- INCOME TAXES

 

 

Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 is amended by

 

adding an entry in numerical order to read in part as follows:

 

 

Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *

 

 

Section 1.6011-4T also issued under 26 U.S.C. 6001 and 6011(a).

 

* * *

 

 

Par. 2. Section 1.6011-4T is added to read as follows:

 

 

Section 1.6011-4T Requirement of statement disclosing participation

 

in certain transactions by corporate taxpayers (Temporary).

 

 

(a) In general. Every taxpayer that is required to file a return

 

for a taxable year with respect to a tax imposed under section 11 and

 

that has participated, directly or indirectly, in a reportable

 

transaction within the meaning of paragraph (b) of this section must

 

attach to its return for the taxable year described in paragraph (d)

 

of this section a disclosure statement in the form prescribed by

 

paragraph (c) of this section. For this purpose, a taxpayer will have

 

indirectly participated in a transaction if its Federal income tax

 

liability is affected by the transaction even if it is not a direct

 

party to the transaction (e.g., it participates through a partnership

 

or through a controlled entity). A separate disclosure statement is

 

required for each reportable transaction. The fact that a taxpayer

 

files a disclosure statement for a reportable transaction shall not

 

affect the legal determination whether the tax benefits claimed with

 

respect to the transaction are allowable.

 

 

(b) Definition of reportable transaction -- (1) In general. A

 

reportable transaction is a transaction that is described in either

 

paragraph (b)(2) or (3) of this section and that meets the projected

 

tax effect test in paragraph (b)(4) of this section. The term

 

transaction includes all of the factual elements necessary to support

 

the tax benefits that are expected to be claimed with respect to any

 

entity, plan, or arrangement, and includes any series of related

 

steps carried out as part of a prearranged plan and any series of

 

substantially similar transactions entered into in the same taxable

 

year.

 

 

(2) Listed transactions. A transaction is described in this

 

paragraph (b)(2) if the transaction is the same as or substantially

 

similar to one of the types of transactions that the Internal Revenue

 

Service (IRS) has determined to be a tax avoidance transaction and

 

identified by notice, regulation, or other form of published guidance

 

as a listed transaction for purposes of section 6011. However, a

 

listed transaction is not treated as a reportable transaction if it

 

has affected the taxpayer's Federal income tax liability as reported

 

on any tax return filed on or before February 28, 2000. The fact that

 

a transaction becomes a listed transaction does not imply that the

 

transaction was not otherwise a reportable transaction prior thereto.

 

 

(3) Other reportable transactions -- (i) In general. Except as

 

provided in paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section, a transaction is

 

described in this paragraph (b)(3) if it is entered into after

 

February 28, 2000, and has at least two of the following

 

characteristics:

 

 

(A) The taxpayer has participated in the transaction under

 

conditions of confidentiality (as defined in section 301.6111-2T(c)).

 

 

(B) The taxpayer has obtained or been provided with contractual

 

protection against the possibility that part or all of the intended

 

tax benefits from the transaction will not be sustained, including,

 

but not limited to, recission rights, the right to a full or partial

 

refund of fees paid to any person, fees that are contingent on the

 

taxpayer's realization of tax benefits from the transaction,

 

insurance protection with respect to the tax treatment of the

 

transaction, or a tax indemnity or similar agreement (other than a

 

customary indemnity provided by a principal to the transaction that

 

did not participate in the promotion of the transaction to the

 

taxpayer).

 

 

(C) The taxpayer's participation in the transaction was

 

promoted, solicited, or recommended by one or more persons who have

 

received or are expected to receive fees or other consideration with

 

an aggregate value in excess of $100,000, and such person or persons'

 

entitlement to such fees or other consideration was contingent on the

 

taxpayer's participation in the transaction.

 

 

(D) The expected treatment of the transaction for Federal income

 

tax purposes in any taxable year differs or is expected to differ by

 

more than $5 million from the treatment of the transaction for

 

purposes of determining book income as taken into account on the

 

schedule M-1 (or comparable schedule) on the taxpayer's Federal

 

corporate income tax return for the same period.

 

 

(E) The transaction involves the participation of a person that

 

the taxpayer knows or has reason to know is in a Federal income tax

 

position that differs from that of the taxpayer (such as a tax exempt

 

entity or a foreign person), and the taxpayer knows or has reason to

 

know that such difference in tax position has permitted the

 

transaction to be structured on terms that are intended to provide

 

the taxpayer with more favorable Federal income tax treatment than it

 

could have obtained without the participation of such person (or

 

another person in a similar tax position).

 

 

(F) The expected characterization of any significant aspect of

 

the transaction for Federal income tax purposes differs from the

 

expected characterization of such aspect of the transaction for

 

purposes of taxation of any party to the transaction in another

 

country.

 

 

(ii) Exceptions. A transaction is not a reportable transaction

 

under paragraph (b)(3) of this section if paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(A),

 

(B), (C), or (D) of this section is satisfied.

 

 

(A) The taxpayer has participated in the transaction in the

 

ordinary course of its business in a form consistent with customary

 

commercial practice, and the taxpayer reasonably determines that it

 

would have participated in the same transaction on substantially the

 

same terms irrespective of the expected Federal income tax benefits.

 

 

(B) The taxpayer has participated in the transaction in the

 

ordinary course of its business in a form consistent with customary

 

commercial practice, and the taxpayer reasonably determines that

 

there is a long-standing and generally accepted understanding that

 

the expected Federal income tax benefits from the transaction (taking

 

into account any combination of intended tax consequences) are

 

allowable under the Internal Revenue Code (Code) for substantially

 

similar transactions.

 

 

(C) The taxpayer reasonably determines that there is no

 

reasonable basis under Federal tax law for denial of any significant

 

portion of the expected Federal income tax benefits from the

 

transaction. Such a determination must take into account the entirety

 

of the transaction and any combination of tax consequences that are

 

expected to result from any component steps of the transaction, must

 

not be based on any unreasonable or unrealistic factual assumptions,

 

and must take into account all relevant aspects of Federal tax law,

 

including the statute and legislative history, treaties,

 

authoritative administrative guidance, and judicial decisions that

 

establish principles of general application in the tax law (e.g.,

 

Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U.S. 465 (1935)).

 

 

(D) The transaction is identified in published guidance as being

 

excepted from disclosure under this section.

 

 

(iii) Ordinary course of business. For purposes of paragraphs

 

(b)(3)(ii)(A) and (B) of this section, a transaction involving the

 

acquisition, disposition, or restructuring of a business, including

 

the acquisition, disposition, or other change in the ownership or

 

control of an entity that is engaged in a business, or a transaction

 

involving a recapitalization or an acquisition of capital for use in

 

the taxpayer's business, shall be considered a transaction carried

 

out in the ordinary course of a taxpayer's business.

 

 

(4) Projected tax effect -- (i) In general. A transaction

 

described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section meets the projected tax

 

effect test if, at the time the taxpayer enters into the transaction

 

or at any time thereafter, the taxpayer reasonably estimates that the

 

transaction will reduce the taxpayer's Federal income tax liability

 

by more than $1 million in any single taxable year or by a total of

 

more than $2 million for any combination of taxable years in which

 

the transaction is expected to have the effect of reducing the

 

taxpayer's Federal income tax liability. A transaction described in

 

paragraph (b)(3) of this section meets the projected tax effect test

 

if, at the time the taxpayer enters into the transaction or at any

 

time thereafter, the taxpayer reasonably estimates that the

 

transaction will reduce the taxpayer's Federal income tax liability

 

by more than $5 million in any single taxable year or by a total of

 

more than $10 million for any combination of taxable years in which

 

the transaction is expected to have the effect of reducing the

 

taxpayer's Federal income tax liability. For purposes of this

 

paragraph (b)(4), a transaction will be treated as reducing a

 

taxpayer's Federal income tax liability for a taxable year if, and to

 

the extent that, disallowance of the tax treatment claimed or

 

expected to be claimed would result in an increase in the taxpayer's

 

Federal income tax liability for that year. These dollar thresholds

 

may be adjusted pursuant to forms prescribed for reporting under this

 

section and the instructions to such forms.

 

 

(ii) Estimation of projected tax effect. A taxpayer's estimate

 

of the effect of a transaction on its Federal income tax liability

 

shall take into account all projected Federal income tax consequences

 

of the transaction, including all deductions, exclusions from gross

 

income, nonrecognition of gain, tax credits, adjustments (or the

 

absence of adjustments) to the basis of property, and any other tax

 

consequences that may reduce the taxpayer's Federal income tax

 

liability by affecting the timing, character, or source of any item

 

of income, gain, deduction, loss, or credit. The estimate shall not

 

take into account the potential Federal income tax effect of any

 

other transaction or transactions that the taxpayer might have

 

entered into if the taxpayer had not entered into the transaction in

 

question. Gross income may not be taken into account if the elements

 

of the transaction that result in the creation of the gross income

 

are not necessary to achieve the intended tax results of the

 

transaction, whether or not these elements are an integral part of

 

the transaction. For example, gross income may not be taken into

 

account to the extent that it would have been reasonably possible for

 

the taxpayer to have participated in the transaction in a manner that

 

would have been expected to produce less gross income without a

 

commensurate effect on the other tax consequences of the transaction.

 

In addition, gain on property that the taxpayer acquired independent

 

of its participation in the transaction may not be taken into

 

account.

 

 

(5) Examples. The following examples illustrate the application

 

of paragraph (b) of this section. Assume, for purposes of these

 

examples, that the transactions are not the same as or substantially

 

similar to any of the types of transactions that the IRS has

 

identified as listed transactions under section 6011 and, thus, are

 

not described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section. The examples are

 

as follows:

 

 

Example 1. In March of 2000, C, a domestic corporation, invests

 

$100 million to purchase certain financial instruments the terms of

 

which have been structured to enable the holder to claim a deductible

 

tax loss upon the disposition of one or more of the instruments a

 

short time after acquisition while deferring gain on the retained

 

instruments. C purchased the instruments on the recommendation of X,

 

which is expected to receive direct or indirect compensation in

 

excess of $100,000 contingent on C's purchase. C disposes of certain

 

of the financial instruments in November of 2000, and reports a loss

 

from the disposition of those financial instruments on its 2000

 

Federal corporate income tax return which reduces its reported

 

Federal income tax liability by more than $5 million. That loss is

 

not reflected on C's income statement for purposes of determining

 

book income as taken into account on the schedule M-1 on C's Federal

 

corporate income tax return. Further, C is unable to reasonably

 

determine that it would have entered into the transaction

 

irrespective of the Federal income tax benefits, or that the

 

transaction is a customary form of transaction giving rise to tax

 

consequences for which there is a long-standing and generally

 

accepted understanding that such tax consequences are allowable under

 

the Code for similar transactions, or that the Commissioner would

 

have no reasonable basis to deny the claimed loss. The transaction

 

involving C's purchase and disposition of the financial instruments

 

has the characteristics described in paragraphs (b)(3)(i)(C) and (D)

 

of this section. None of the exceptions in paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of

 

this section applies. Therefore, the transaction involving C's

 

purchase and disposition of the financial instruments is a reportable

 

transaction because it is described in paragraph (b)(3) of this

 

section.

 

 

Example 2. In the year 2001, D, a domestic corporation,

 

completes construction of an office building to be used in its

 

business. After completion of the building but before D files its tax

 

return for the year 2001, it is approached by Y, a professional

 

services organization, which advises D that Y has developed a set of

 

programs that will enable D to maximize its depreciation deductions

 

with respect to the building and the related furniture and fixtures.

 

Y allows D to review Y's programs subject to D's agreement that it

 

will not use any portion of the programs in establishing its

 

depreciation accounts for Federal tax purposes unless it pays Y a fee

 

of $150,000. In addition, D makes a commitment to Y that it will not

 

divulge any information relating to the programs to any person,

 

whether or not D decides to use the programs. D agrees to use Y's

 

programs for purposes of computing its depreciation allowances for

 

2001 and later taxable years. D expects its use of the programs to

 

reduce its Federal income tax liability by more than $10 million over

 

the life of the building. However, D reasonably determines that it

 

would have constructed and owned the office building in the same

 

manner irrespective of the enhanced depreciation that it expects to

 

derive from the use of Y's programs. Therefore, regardless of whether

 

D's depreciation deductions on the building may be subject to

 

disallowance, the transaction encompassing the construction of the

 

building and the use of Y's programs is not a reportable transaction

 

by reason of the exception under paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(A) of this

 

section.

 

 

Example 3. E is a domestic corporation, which is a calendar year

 

taxpayer. E is engaged in the leasing business. In 2001, E enters

 

into a large number of substantially similar arrangements described

 

in paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section under which it acquires and

 

leases tangible personal property to U.S. persons who use such

 

property in their businesses. E treats the leases as leases for

 

Federal income tax purposes and as loans for financial accounting

 

purposes. During the first three taxable years in which the leases

 

are in effect, E reasonably expects that its reported taxable income

 

will be more than $30 million lower than it would be if the leases

 

were treated as loans for Federal income tax purposes, giving rise to

 

a total expected reduction of E's Federal income tax liability for

 

those years in excess of $10 million. E cannot conclude that it would

 

have entered into the leases on substantially the same terms

 

irrespective of the expected Federal income tax benefits, nor can it

 

conclude that the Commissioner would have no reasonable basis to deny

 

its tax treatment of the leases. However, E does reasonably determine

 

that the terms of the leases are consistent with customary commercial

 

form in the leasing industry, and that there is a long-standing and

 

generally accepted understanding that the combination of Federal

 

income tax consequences it is claiming with respect to the leases are

 

allowable under the Code for similar transactions. The substantially

 

similar leases would be treated for purposes of this section as a

 

single transaction that would satisfy the projected tax effect test

 

described in paragraph (b)(4) of this section. However, the leases

 

would not be a reportable transaction by reason of the exception

 

under paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(B) of this section.

 

 

(c) Form and content of disclosure statement.(1) The disclosure

 

statement for each reportable transaction must include the

 

information required by paragraph (c)(1)(i) through (c)(1)(vi) of

 

this section and shall be presented in a format (preferably no longer

 

than one page) similar to that shown in the Example in paragraph

 

(c)(2) of this section or on such form as may be prescribed for use

 

under this section.

 

 

(i) The name, if any, by which the transaction is known or

 

commonly referred to by the taxpayer; if no name exists, provide a

 

short-hand designation of this transaction to distinguish it from

 

other reportable transactions in which the taxpayer may have

 

participated (or may participate in the future).

 

 

(ii) A statement indicating whether, to the best knowledge of

 

the taxpayer, the transaction has been registered as a tax shelter

 

under section 6111. If the transaction has been registered as a tax

 

shelter under section 6111, indicate whether Form 8271, "Investor

 

Reporting of Tax Shelter Registration Number", has been filed with

 

the taxpayer's return and provide the registration number, if any,

 

that has been assigned to the tax shelter.

 

 

(iii) A brief description of the principal elements of the

 

transaction that give rise to the expected tax benefits.

 

 

(iv) A brief description of the expected tax benefits of the

 

transaction (e.g., loss deductions, interest deductions, rental

 

deductions, foreign tax credits, etc.).

 

 

(v) An identification of each taxable year (including prior

 

taxable years) for which the transaction is expected to have the

 

effect of reducing the taxpayer's Federal income tax liability and an

 

estimate (which may be rounded to the nearest $1 million) of the

 

amount by which the transaction is expected to reduce the taxpayer's

 

Federal income tax liability for each such taxable year.

 

 

(vi) The names and addresses of any parties who promoted,

 

solicited, or recommended the taxpayer's participation in the

 

transaction and who had a financial interest, including the receipt

 

of fees, in the taxpayer's decision to participate.

 

 

(2) Example. The following example illustrates the application

 

of paragraph (c) of this section: In January of 1999, X, a domestic

 

corporation which is a calendar year taxpayer, entered into an

 

arrangement under which it purported to lease a building owned and

 

occupied by the government of a municipality located in foreign

 

country W and lease the building back to the municipal government. X

 

determines that the transaction is a reportable transaction described

 

in paragraph (b)(1) of this section because it is described in

 

paragraph (b)(2) of this section and satisfies the projected tax

 

effect test in paragraph (b)(4) of this section. As of February 28,

 

2000, X had not filed its 1999 Federal corporate income tax return.

 

The following form of disclosure statement would satisfy the

 

requirements described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section.

 

_____________________________________________________________________

 

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR REPORTABLE TRANSACTION

 

 

Corporation X (EIN)

 

(address)

 

 

1. Identification of transaction: LILO-Country W

 

 

2. Registration status under section 6111: Not registered

 

 

3. Description of transaction: We leased a building from a

 

municipality in W. We made an advance payment of rent of $89

 

million. The lease term is 34 years. The foreign municipality

 

subleased the asset back from us for a term of 20 years. The

 

foreign municipality has the option, at the end of the

 

sublease term, to buy out our interest for $50 million. Our

 

advance lease payment has been financed with a bank loan of

 

$60 million. The foreign municipality placed $75 million of

 

the advance rental payment in special accounts to satisfy the

 

sublease and buyout obligations.

 

 

4. Principal tax benefits: Deductions for rental and interest

 

payments in excess of income from leaseback rental payments

 

 

5. Estimates of expected reduction of Federal income tax

 

liability for affected taxable years: 1999-2002, $5 million

 

per year; 2003-2013, $4 million per year; and 2014-2017, $3

 

million per year.

 

 

6. Promoters: Financial Institution Y

 

(address)

 

(telephone number)

 

 

Professional Service Firm Z

 

(address)

 

(telephone number)

 

_____________________________________________________________________

 

 

(d) Time of providing disclosure -- (1) In general. The

 

disclosure statement for a reportable transaction shall be attached

 

to the taxpayer's Federal corporate income tax return for each

 

taxable year for which the taxpayer's Federal income tax liability is

 

affected by its participation in the transaction. In addition, at the

 

same time that the disclosure statement is first attached to the

 

taxpayer's Federal income tax return, a copy of that disclosure

 

statement must be sent to: Internal Revenue Service LM:PF, Large &

 

Mid-Size Business Division, 1111 Constitution Ave., N.W., Washington,

 

DC 20224. If a transaction becomes a reportable transaction on or

 

after the date the taxpayer has filed its return for the first

 

taxable year for which the transaction affected the taxpayer's

 

Federal income tax liability (e.g., there is a change in facts

 

affecting the expected Federal income tax effect of the transaction,

 

or the transaction subsequently becomes one identified in published

 

guidance as a listed transaction described in (b)(2) of this

 

section), the disclosure statement shall be filed as an attachment to

 

the taxpayer's Federal corporate income tax return next filed after

 

the date the transaction becomes a reportable transaction. If a

 

disclosure statement is required as an attachment to a Federal

 

corporate income tax return that is filed earlier than 180 days after

 

February 28, 2000, the taxpayer may either attach the disclosure

 

statement to the return, or file the disclosure statement as an

 

amendment to the return no later than 180 days after February 28,

 

2000.

 

 

(2) Example. The following example illustrates the application

 

of this paragraph (d): In December of 2000, F, a domestic corporation

 

which is a calendar year taxpayer, enters into a transaction

 

described in paragraph (b)(3) of this section but not described in

 

paragraph (b)(2) of this section. At the time F enters into the

 

transaction and thereafter, F reasonably estimates that the

 

transaction will reduce F's Federal income tax liability by $2

 

million in any single taxable year and by a total of $8 million for

 

any combination of taxable years in which the transaction is expected

 

to have the effect of reducing F's Federal income tax liability.

 

Consequently, the transaction does not meet the projected tax effect

 

test described in paragraph (b)(4) of this section for transactions

 

described in paragraph (b)(3) of this section. On March 1, 2002, the

 

IRS publishes a notice identifying the transaction as a listed

 

transaction described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section. Thus, upon

 

issuance of the notice, the transaction becomes a transaction

 

described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section. As a result of the

 

lower dollar thresholds of the projected tax effect test with respect

 

to transactions described in (b)(2) of this section, the transaction

 

meets the projected tax effect test in paragraph (b)(4) of this

 

section. Consequently, the transaction becomes a reportable

 

transaction described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, and F is

 

required to file a disclosure statement meeting the requirements of

 

paragraph (c)(1) of this section for the transaction as an attachment

 

to F's next filed Federal corporate income tax return. If F's 2001

 

return has not been filed on or before the date the Service

 

identifies the transaction as a listed transaction, the disclosure

 

statement must be attached to F's 2001 return.

 

 

(e) Retention of documents. The taxpayer must retain all

 

documents related to a transaction subject to disclosure under this

 

section until the expiration of the statute of limitations applicable

 

to the first taxable year for which disclosure of the transaction was

 

made in accordance with the requirements of this section. (This

 

document retention requirement is in addition to any document

 

retention requirements that section 6001 generally imposes on the

 

taxpayer.) Such documents include, but are not limited to, the

 

following: all marketing materials related to the transaction; all

 

written analyses used in decision-making related to the transaction;

 

all correspondence and agreements related to the transaction between

 

the taxpayer and any promoter, advisor, lender, or other party to the

 

reportable transaction; all documents discussing, referring to, or

 

demonstrating the tax benefits arising from the reportable

 

transaction; and all documents, if any, referring to the business

 

purposes for the reportable transaction.

 

 

(f) Affiliated groups. For purposes of this section, an

 

affiliated group of corporations that joins in the filing of a

 

consolidated return under section 1501 shall be considered a single

 

taxpayer.

 

 

(g) Effective date. This section applies to Federal corporate

 

income tax returns filed after February 28, 2000. However, paragraph

 

(e) of this section applies to documents and other records that the

 

taxpayer acquires, prepares, or has in its possession on or after

 

February 28, 2000.

 

 

Par. 3. In section 602.101, paragraph (b) is amended by adding

 

an entry for section 1.6011-4T to read in part as follows:

 

 

Section 602.101 OMB Control numbers.

 

 

* * * * *

 

 

(b) * * *

 

_____________________________________________________________________

 

CFR part or section where Current OMB

 

identified and described control No.

 

_____________________________________________________________________

 

* * * * *

 

1.6011-4T 1545-1685

 

* * * * *

 

_____________________________________________________________________

 

 

Charles O. Rossotti

 

Commissioner of Internal Revenue

 

 

Approved: 2/23/00

 

 

Jonathan Talisman

 

Acting Assistant Secretary of the

 

Treasury
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Institutional Authors
    Internal Revenue Service
  • Cross-Reference
    REG-103735-00.

    Notice 2000-15.

    This document appeared in TNT as 2000 TNT 40-17 Database 'Tax Notes Today 2000', View '(Number' and in the AccServ &

    Microfiche as Doc 2000-5715 (27 original pages).
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Areas/Tax Topics
  • Index Terms
    shelters
    shelters, registration
    returns
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 2000-6361 (7 original pages)
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2000 TNT 44-89
Copy RID